Time shift between precipitation and evaporation has more impact on annual streamflow variability than the elasticity of potential evaporation

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One of the most basic questions asked of hydrologists is the quantification of catchment response to climatic variations, i.e., the variations around the average annual flow given the climatic anomaly of a particular year. This paper presents an analysis based on 4122 catchments from four continents, where we investigate how annual streamflow variability depends on climate variables-rainfall and potential evaporation-and on the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation. We use catchment data to verify the existence of this link and show that, in all countries and under the main climates represented, anomalies in this synchronicity are the second most important factor to explain annual streamflow anomalies, after precipitation, but before potential evaporation. Introducing the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation as an independent variable improves the prediction of annual streamflow variability with an average additional explained variance of 6 % globally.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andréassian, V., Guimarães, G. M., De Lavenne, A., & Lerat, J. (2025). Time shift between precipitation and evaporation has more impact on annual streamflow variability than the elasticity of potential evaporation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29(20), 5477–5491. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free