Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for adenotonsillectomy

158Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Summary: One hundred and four patients were allocated randomly to receive anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy via either a reinforced laryngeal mask airway or a tracheal tube. Airway maintenance and protection were assessed during and after operation. The reinforced laryngeal mask did not interfere with surgical access; it resisted compression and protected the lower airway from contamination with blood. Four patients were withdrawn from the laryngeal mask airway group: two because of difficulty with placement, and two because the laryngeal mask was obstructed distally when the Boyle Davis gag was opened fully. In children, recovery was less eventful in the laryngeal mask airway group, with less airway obstruction (P < 0.001) and better airway acceptance (P < 0.05). The reinforced laryngeal mask airway provided a clear, secure airway until recovery of protective reflexes. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 70: 30-33) © 1993 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, P. J., & Bailey, P. M. (1993). Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for adenotonsillectomy. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 70(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/70.1.30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free