A pilot survey of decisions by acute medicine staff after thunderclap headache

4Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction and aims: Traditionally, neurologically pristine patients with a thunderclap headache are investigated with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scan, which if negative is followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude important secondary causes, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, misdiagnosis of such patients is still a cause of significant human and financial cost and a regular reason for medical litigation. This study explores the approach of emergency medicine and acute medicine clinicians to the investigation of a patient with thunderclap headache. Methods: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey based on a clinical vignette of a 45-year-old man presenting with a thunderclap headache who had a pristine neurological examination. Results: A total of 160 clinicians responded. The majority (89%) elected to perform a non-contrast CT brain as their first investigation, though five clinicians discharged the patient without investigation. If the CT was negative, only 84% would then proceed to LP, but 20% would undertake this investigation before 12 hours from headache onset. Conclusions: Most clinicians investigate neurologically intact patients with thunderclap headache following a CT/LP strategy, but deviations from recommended practice are common. © 2013 Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dobb, B., & Cooper, J. (2013). A pilot survey of decisions by acute medicine staff after thunderclap headache. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 43(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2013.304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free