Validity of self-reporting of episodes of external genital warts

19Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To determine whether men are able to self-diagnose external genital warts (EGWs), we studied data from 1115 men with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. Men were largely unable to accurately assess the presence of EGWs. Self-reporting of EGWs was not a sensitive tool; only 38% of men who had EGWs diagnosed by a trained examiner who used bright light and visual inspection also reported having them. When we controlled for other covariates in a multivariate model, men who had EGWs diagnosed by an examiner were 14 times less likely to show concordance between examiner findings and self-report than were men who did not have EGWs diagnosed by an examiner (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.09). Self-diagnosis and self-assessment may not accurately reflect the presence of EGWs, and self-diagnosis should not be used in place of an examiner's findings for epidemiologic studies that seek to determine the cause of disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wiley, D. J., Grosser, S., Qi, K., Visscher, B. R., Beutner, K., Strathdee, S. A., … Melnick, S. (2002). Validity of self-reporting of episodes of external genital warts. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 35(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/340743

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free