On hylemorphism and personal identity

29Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is no such thing as 'the' hylemorphic account of personal identity. There are several views that count as hylemorphic, and these views can be grouped into two main families - the corruptionist view, and the survivalist view. The differentiating factor is that the corruptionist view holds that the persistence of the soul is not sufficient for the persistence of the person, while the survivalist view holds that the persistence of the soul is sufficient for the persistence of the person. In this paper, I argue that hylemorphists should prefer the corruptionist view. This project ought to be of interest to anyone working on issues of personal identity, not only because hylemorphic views are historically important, but also because they are currently receiving significant attention in the personal identity literature. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toner, P. (2011). On hylemorphism and personal identity. European Journal of Philosophy, 19(3), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00381.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free