Rethinking digitalization and climate: don’t predict, mitigate

  • Gritsenko D
  • Aaen J
  • Flyvbjerg B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Digitalization is a core component of the green transition. Today’s focus is on quantifying and predicting the climate effects of digitalization through various life-cycle assessments and baseline scenario methodologies. Here we argue that this is a mistake. Most attempts at prediction are based on three implicit assumptions: (a) the digital carbon footprint can be quantified, (b) business-as-usual with episodic change leading to a new era of stability, and (c) investments in digitalization will be delivered within the cost, timeframe, and benefits described in their business cases. We problematize each assumption within the context of digitalization and argue that the digital carbon footprint is inherently unpredictable. We build on uncertainty literature to show that even if you cannot predict, you can still mitigate. On that basis, we propose to rethink practice on the digital carbon footprint from prediction to mitigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gritsenko, D., Aaen, J., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2024). Rethinking digitalization and climate: don’t predict, mitigate. Npj Climate Action, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00127-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free