Scientific, clinical, regulatory, and economic aspects of choosing bone graft/biological options in spine surgery

23Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Spinal arthrodesis is a major element of the spinal surgeon's practice. To attain successful fusion rates, attentionmust be paid to spinal segment immobilization and proper selection of bone graft. Autogenous bone graft (ie, ICBG), the "gold standard," with or without graft extenders and enhancers provides the foundation for most spinal fusions. ABG is the only graft option containing all 3 factors of new bone growth: osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, and osteogenicity. While many bone graft alternatives function well as bone graft extenders, only growth factors proteins (ie, rhBMP-2 or OP-2) function as bone graft enhancers and substitutes. The search for optimal hybrid interbody cages, bone graft substitutes, autogenous or allogenic stem cells, and nanostructure scaffolds for release of growth factors continues.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, K. A., Russo, G. S., Vaccaro, A. R., & Arnold, P. M. (2019, April 1). Scientific, clinical, regulatory, and economic aspects of choosing bone graft/biological options in spine surgery. Clinical Neurosurgery. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free