Bioavailability of vitamin D biofortified pork meat: results of an acute human crossover study

  • Neill H
  • Gill C
  • McDonald E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vitamin D intakes are concerningly low (1). Relatively few foods contain high levels of vitamin D and therefore, coupled with varying diurnal ultraviolet‐B (UVB) radiation intensity and poor supplement uptake, hypovitaminosis D is prevalent(2). Food‐based strategies, such as endogenous biofortification, are urgently warranted to increase vitamin D intakes and subsequently improve 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations. No research to date has explored the bioavailability of ultraviolet (UV)‐biofortified pork in humans (3). Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the efficacy of vitamin D biofortified pork to increase 25(OH)D3 concentrations, compared to a dose‐matched vitamin D3 supplement and control pork in adults. An acute randomised double‐blind, controlled, three‐way crossover study was conducted in healthy Caucasian adults (n = 14; age: 23 ± 6 y; body mass index: 21.8 ± 1.8 kg/m2). Participants received either biofortified pork derived from pigs exposed UVB light (5 μg vitamin D3/portion), control pork (1.8 μg vitamin D3/portion) or a supplement (5 μg vitamin D3), with a 2‐week washout period between each visit. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and then 1.5, 3, 6, 9 and 24 hour postprandially. Serum 25(OH)D3 was analysed by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‐MS/MS). The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04207294). There was a significant effect of time (p < 0.01) and a significant treatment∗time interaction (p < 0.05). UV pork and supplement significantly increased within‐group serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations over timepoints (p < 0.05). Average peak blood concentration (Cmax) values were modestly higher with supplementation (Supplement: 44.3 nmol/L; UV pork: 42.4 mol/L; Control pork 38.4 nmol/L). Between‐group analysis showed no significant difference at any timepoint and there were no significant differences in area under the curve (AUC) between treatments, even when split by vitamin D status (

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neill, H. R., Gill, C. I. R., McDonald, E. J., McRoberts, W. C., McAleenon, R., Slevin, M. M., … Pourshahidi, L. K. (2022). Bioavailability of vitamin D biofortified pork meat: results of an acute human crossover study. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 81(OCE4). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665122001380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free