Priority setting: Right answer to a far too narrow question?: Comment on “Global developments in priority setting in health”

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In their recent editorial, Baltussen and colleagues provide a concise summary of the prevailing discourse on priority-setting in health policy. Their perspective is entirely consistent with current practice, yet they unintentionally demonstrate the narrowness and moral precariousness of that discourse and practice. I respond with demonstrations of the importance of ‘interrogating scarcity’ in a variety of contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schrecker, T. (2018, January 1). Priority setting: Right answer to a far too narrow question?: Comment on “Global developments in priority setting in health.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management. Kerman University of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.66

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free