Single-shot policy explanation to improve task performance via semantic reward coaching

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Communication is crucial for synchronizing expectations and knowledge within teams. For robots to effectively collaborate with or provide actionable decision-support or coaching to humans, it is critical that they be able to generate intelligible explanations to reconcile differences between their understanding of the world and that of their collaborators. In this work we present Single-shot Policy Elicitation for Augmenting Rewards (SPEAR), a novel sequential optimization algorithm that uses semantic explanations derived from combinations of planning predicates to augment human agents’ reward functions, driving their policies to exhibit more optimal behavior by modeling humans as reinforcement learning (RL) agents and reconciling disparities in their reward function. We present an experimental validation of the policy manipulation capabilities of SPEAR in a practically grounded application and a performance analysis of SPEAR across a suite of domains with increasingly complex state spaces and predicate counts. SPEAR demonstrates substantial improvements in runtime and addressable problem size, enabling an expert agent to leverage its own expertise to communicate actionable information to improve human performance. Through a series of human subjects studies, we demonstrate SPEAR’s potential to improve human policies and reduce cognitive load, all while enhancing interpretability, task awareness, and promoting active thinking patterns among users. Finally, we apply SPEAR in a robot-to-robot policy manipulation scenario, showcasing its applicability in robot-robot collaborations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tabrez, A., Leonard, R., & Hayes, B. (2025). Single-shot policy explanation to improve task performance via semantic reward coaching. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(26), 22315–22337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-025-11477-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free