Serum 20S proteasome is elevated in patients with renal cell carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis

35Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To date, no reliable serum marker for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the putative significance of circulating 20S proteasome levels. Methods: Preoperative 20S proteasome serum levels were determined in 113 CCRCC patients and 15 healthy controls by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Associations with CCRCC, pathological variables, disease-specific survival (DSS), and response to sunitinib were evaluated.Results:Median 20S proteasome levels were higher in CCRCC patients than in healthy controls (4.66 vs 1.52 μg ml -1, P<0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve curve was 87.1%. The 20S proteasome levels were associated with symptoms (P=0.0008), distant metastases (P=0.0011), grade (P=0.0247), and necrosis (P=0.0462). The 20S proteasome levels were identified as a prognostic factor for DSS in both univariable (hazards ratio 1.21, P<0.001) and multivariable (hazards ratio 1.17, P=0.0015) survival analysis. In patients responding to sunitinib, 20S proteasome levels were lower than in patients with stable disease and progressive disease. Conclusion: This study demonstrates for the first time that increased 20S proteasome levels are associated with CCRCC, advanced disease, and poor prognosis. Routine use of this marker may allow better diagnosis, risk stratification, risk-adjusted follow-up, and identification of patients with a greater likelihood of response to targeted therapy. © 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Martino, M., Hoetzenecker, K., Ankersmit, H. J., Roth, G. A., Haitel, A., Waldert, M., & Klatte, T. (2012). Serum 20S proteasome is elevated in patients with renal cell carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis. British Journal of Cancer, 106(5), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free