Silence is Complicity: Theological Failure in the Face of Genocide

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we argue that public theologians have a rich tradition from which to argue for the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people. In particular, Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s resistance to the co-opting of Christianity by the Nazi regime is frequently cited in theological circles as an exemplar. Yet, we find major public figures and theological societies, such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, and the United Kingdom’s Society for the Study of Theology (SST) to be wanting in this regard. From an examination of Welby’s comments on the Israeli bombardment in Gaza, and the SST’s response to our open letter and the lament from Palestinian Christians, we argue that theologians are failing. We draw on Palestinian liberation theology and anticolonial theologies to argue that the work of liberation is the raison d’être of theology and requires political activism. We conclude, therefore, that theological silence is complicity in injustice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McIntosh, E., & Ranawana, A. M. (2024). Silence is Complicity: Theological Failure in the Face of Genocide. International Journal of Public Theology, 18(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20241605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free