Comparison of different keratometers with the EyeSys videokeratoscope

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the accuracy and the reproducibility of the measurements using a Haag-Streit, a Shin-Nippon, and a Carl Zeiss keratometer and an EyeSys videokeratoscope. Two investigators performed 20 measurements on 3 calibrated steel balls and 5 measurements on 22 normal corneas with all instruments. Calculating the accuracy of the measurements the limits of the 95% confidence intervals of the bias were determined. The accuracy was better than ± 0.1D for the keratometers, whereas it was better than ± 0.25D for the EyeSys videokeratoscope. The coefficient of reproducibility (1.96 x standard deviation) on test balls and corneas was smaller than 0.25D in the case of the Shin-Nippon and Carl Zeiss keratometers and the EyeSys videokeratoscope whereas it was between 0.25-0.5D in the case of the Haag-Streit keratometer. The Carl Zeiss keratometer was the best with respect to the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements. Paired t-test was used to find possible significant differences between the results of the two investigators, but only clinically insignificant differences were found.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vámosi, P., Sohajda, Z., Módis, L., Vámosi, G., & Berta, A. (1998). Comparison of different keratometers with the EyeSys videokeratoscope. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 76(2), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760207.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free