An empirical study of two approaches to sequence learning for anomaly detection

62Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper introduces the computer security domain of anomaly detection and formulates it as a machine learning task on temporal sequence data. In this domain, the goal is to develop a model or profile of the normal working state of a system user and to detect anomalous conditions as long-term deviations from the expected behavior patterns. We introduce two approaches to this problem? one employing instance-based learning (EBL) and the other using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Though not suitable for a comprehensive security solution, both approaches achieve anomaly identification performance sufficient for a low-level "focus of attention" detector in a multitier security system. Further, we evaluate model scaling techniques for the two approaches: two clustering techniques for the BBL approach and variation of the number of hidden states for the HMM approach. We find that over both model classes and a wide range of model scales, there is no significant difference in performance at recognizing the profiled user. We take this invariance as evidence that, in this security domain, limited memory models (e.g., fixed-length instances or low-order Markov models) can learn only part of the user identity information in which we're interested and that substantially different models will be necessary if dramatic improvements in user-based anomaly detection are to be achieved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lane, T., & Brodley, C. E. (2003). An empirical study of two approaches to sequence learning for anomaly detection. Machine Learning, 51(1), 73–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021830128811

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free