Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of screening strategies for maturity-onset diabetes of the young in three European countries

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Correct diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), which is often misdiagnosed as Type 1 or 2 diabetes, is important for providing appropriate treatment. Materials & Methods: A diabetes model was adapted to Hungary, the Netherlands, and the UK to analyse the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of different screening strategies for MODY with 20 years time horizon. Results: Compared with no screening, screening with the MODY calculator then genetic testing is considered cost-effective with respect to each country's willingness to pay threshold. The addition of autoantibody testing dominated the no screening strategy. The budget impact of the strategies ranges between 0.001 and 0.025% of annual public healthcare spending. Conclusion: The analysed strategies are considered good value for money with potential cost savings in the long term.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szilberhorn, L., Zelei, T., Vellekoop, H., Huygens, S., Versteegh, M., Mölken, M. R. V., … Nagy, B. (2023). Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of screening strategies for maturity-onset diabetes of the young in three European countries. Personalized Medicine, 20(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2023-0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free