Genital human papillomavirus infection in men: Incidence and risk factors in a cohort of university students

205Citations
Citations of this article
167Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. In contrast to the wealth of data on human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in women, much less is known about HPV in men. Methods. Between June 2003 and March 2006, a total of 240 heterosexually active male university students 18-20 years of age were recruited for participation in a cohort study of HPV infection. Genital cell samples were collected, at 4-month intervals, for HPV-DNA analysis by polymerase chain reaction. The subjects maintained a Web-based journal of sexual activity. Results. At 24 months, the cumulative incidence of new infection of any genital HPV type was 62.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.6%-72.2%). Acquisition rates did not differ by genital site (i.e., glans, penile shaft, or scrotum) of initial detection (P = .86). The most commonly detected types were HPV-84 and HPV-16. In multivariate analysis, a report of a new sex partner during the prior 0-4 (hazards ratio [HR], 2.0 [95% CI, 1.3-3.0]) and 5-8 (HR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2-2.7]) months and a history of smoking (HR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.4]) were associated with an elevated risk of HPV acquisition. Conclusion. Genital HPV infection is common and multifocal in young men, and its incidence is higher than that reported for similar cohorts of young women. The high rates of HPV infection in men should be considered when strategies for the prevention of HPV infection in female adolescents and young women are being developed. © 2007 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Partridge, J. M., Hughes, J. P., Feng, Q., Winer, R. L., Weaver, B. A., Xi, L. F., … Koutsky, L. A. (2007). Genital human papillomavirus infection in men: Incidence and risk factors in a cohort of university students. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 196(8), 1128–1136. https://doi.org/10.1086/521192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free