Combined antibiotic therapy spacers either commercial or handmade are superior to monotherapy - A microbiological analysis at the second stage of revision

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic-loaded spacers are often used during two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) both for its mechanical properties and as a means of local antibiotic delivery. Purpose: The main goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of different options of antibiotic(s) in spacers concerning the rate of positive cultures at the second stage. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated two-stage exchange procedures for infected hip or knee arthroplasty performed between 2012 and 2018 in which adequate (at least four deep tissue samples) culture results in both stages were available. The type of spacer and antibiotics used, in addition to several other patient, infection and treatment-related variables, were registered and correlated to microbiological findings in the second stage. Results: Fifty-eight cases were included with a 19.0ĝ€¯% (11/58) overall rate of positive cultures during reimplantation. With a mean follow-up of 46 months, failure rate was significantly higher at 63.6ĝ€¯% (7/11) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 4.3ĝ€¯% (2/47) for those with negative cultures during reimplantation (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dias Carvalho, A., Ribau, A., Soares, D., Santos, A. C., Abreu, M., & Sousa, R. (2021). Combined antibiotic therapy spacers either commercial or handmade are superior to monotherapy - A microbiological analysis at the second stage of revision. Journal of Bone and Joint Infection, 6(7), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-305-2021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free