Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience

46Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are multiple sclerosis (MS) oral therapies that became available in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Objective: The objective of this article is to compare discontinuation rates, efficacy, and adverse events (AEs) of FTY and DMF over two years. Methods: Patients prescribed FTY or DMF at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado prior to October 2013 were identified. Clinician-reported data were retrospectively collected. Primary outcome was discontinuation of drug by the end of year two. Reasons for discontinuation were evaluated. Results: A total of 271 FTY and 342 DMF patients were evaluated. Patients had a mean age of 42.5 (FTY) and 45.8 (DMF) years and were predominantly female (72.0% FTY; 69.6% DMF) and white (86.3% FTY; 82.2% DMF). At ≤24 months, 93 (34.3%) and 161 (47.1%) discontinued FTY and DMF, respectively, with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.70 (1.23–2.37, p = 0.002), or 1.69 (1.16–2.46, p = 0.006) for the doubly robust propensity score weighted estimator. Primary reason for discontinuation was AEs, which were less likely for FTY 46 (17.0%) compared to DMF 82 (24.0%) (OR 1.54, 1.03–2.31, p = 0.035). Discontinuation due to disease activity (FTY (10%) DMF (11.1%); OR 1.13, 0.67–1.90, p = 0.647) and breakthrough disease activity, regardless of discontinuation (FTY (34.7%) DMF (33.6%); OR 0.95, 0.68–1.34, p = 0.783), were similar. Conclusions: The odds of discontinuation were less for FTY than DMF, and were driven by AEs for both drugs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vollmer, B., Nair, K. V., Sillau, S. H., Corboy, J., Vollmer, T., & Alvarez, E. (2017). Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience. Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217317725102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free