Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from the Nottingham Faecal Occult Blood Trial

  • Whynes D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

SETTING: A randomised controlled trial (1981-present) of 153,000 subjects, of whom approximately half were offered biennial FOB testing over up to five screening rounds.METHODS: The additional costs of participation in screening relative to symptomatic presentation were calculated by combining the results of (i) a comprehensive audit of resource use on the part of subjects within the trial, (ii) previously-established unit costs for each of the procedures involved. Life expectancy gains were estimated from a survival analysis of those trial subjects who had been diagnosed with cancer (screening participants vs controls).RESULTS: The cost of screening under the Nottingham trial protocol was pound 5290 per cancer detected (at 2002 prices). Under conservative assumptions, the incremental cost per life year gained as a result of screening was pound 1584 (Confidence Interval [CI]:717 to 8612).OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of faecal occult blood (FOB) screening for colorectal cancer within the Nottingham trial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whynes, D. K. (2004). Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from the Nottingham Faecal Occult Blood Trial. Journal of Medical Screening, 11(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/096914130301100104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free