Why poss-type compounds should be considered nanomodifiers, not nanofillers—a polypropylene blends case study

9Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this work, a seriTables of silsesquioxanes (SSQ) and spherosilicates (SS), comprising a group of cage siloxane (CS) compounds, was tested as functional additives for preparation of isotactic polypropylene (iPP)-based nanocomposites and discussed in the aspect of their rationale of applicability as such additives. For this purpose, the compounds were prepared by condensation and olefin hydrosilylation reactions. The effect of these cage siloxane products on properties of obtained CS/iPP nanocomposites was analyzed by means of mechanical, microscopic (scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy), thermal (differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry), thermomechanical (Vicat softening point) analyses. The results were compared with the previous findings on CS/polyolefin composites. The role of CS compounds was discussed in terms of plastic processing additives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brząkalski, D., Przekop, R. E., Sztorch, B., Frydrych, M., Pakuła, D., Jałbrzykowski, M., … Marciniec, B. (2021). Why poss-type compounds should be considered nanomodifiers, not nanofillers—a polypropylene blends case study. Polymers, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free