Long-term prognostic value of an index of myocardial performance in patients with myocardial infarction

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The Tei index of myocardial performance (IMP), which combines parameters of both systolic and diastolic ventricular function, is a useful prognostic factor in many clinical settings. Hypothesis: This study assessed the long-term prognostic value of IMP in patients discharged from hospital after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Doppler/echocardiographic studies were recorded in 90 consecutive patients on Day 14 ± 2 following an AMI. The IMP was calculated from the Doppler recordings, as a sum of isovolumetric contraction time and isovolumetric relaxation time, divided by the ejection time. Results: The patients were followed for an average (SD) of 57.8 (16.1) months. During this period there were 22 (24%) cardiac events, defined as cardiac deaths (10) or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarctions (12). After multivariate Cox analysis, Tei index>0.55 (relative risk [RR] 4.45;95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-15.45;p=0.019), LV end-systolic volume>65 ml (RR 3.23;95% CI 1.34-7.79;p=0.009), and mitral E wave deceleration time≤0.145 s (RR 2.94;95% CI 1.24-6.92;p=0.014) were the only independent predictors of cardiac events during the follow-up period. In a subgroup of patients with preserved LV systolic function (ejection fraction >0.40), IMP was the only predictor of cardiac events (RR 6.37;95% CI 1.32-30.77, p=0.02). Conclusions: The Tei index of myocardial performance, which is simple and easy to calculate, is a useful tool for risk assessment in patients following myocardial infarction, and in a subgroup of patients with normal or only mildly impaired systolic function.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szymański, P., Rezler, J., Stec, S., & Budaj, A. (2002). Long-term prognostic value of an index of myocardial performance in patients with myocardial infarction. Clinical Cardiology, 25(8), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4950250807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free