Closing the Loop: Unexamined Performance Trade-Offs of Integrating Direct Air Capture with (Bi)carbonate Electrolysis

41Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

CO2 from carbonate-based capture solutions requires a substantial energy input. Replacing this step with (bi)carbonate electrolysis has been commonly proposed as an efficient alternative that coproduces CO/syngas. Here, we assess the feasibility of directly integrating air contactors with (bi)carbonate electrolyzers by leveraging process, multiphysics, microkinetic, and technoeconomic models. We show that the copresence of CO32- with HCO3- in the contactor effluent greatly diminishes the electrolyzer performance and eventually results in a reduced CO2 capture fraction to ≤1%. Additionally, we estimate suitable effluents for (bi)carbonate electrolysis to require 5-14 times larger contactors than conventionally needed contactors, leading to unfavorable process economics. Notably, we show that the regeneration of the capture solvent inside (bi)carbonate electrolyzers is insufficient for CO2 recapture. Thus, we suggest process modifications that would allow this route to be operationally feasible. Overall, this work sheds light on the practical operation of integrated direct air capture with (bi)carbonate electrolysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almajed, H. M., Kas, R., Brimley, P., Crow, A. M., Somoza-Tornos, A., Hodge, B. M., … Smith, W. A. (2024). Closing the Loop: Unexamined Performance Trade-Offs of Integrating Direct Air Capture with (Bi)carbonate Electrolysis. ACS Energy Letters, 9(5), 2472–2483. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free