Correction: Exoskeleton-based training improves walking independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients: results from a randomized controlled trial (Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, (2023), 20, 1, (36), 10.1186/s12984-023-01158-z)

Abstract

In the original version of this article [1], WISCI-II variable values in the “Baseline and Post-intervention” row of Table 3 has been updated and same has been shown below. (Table presented.) Functional outcomes following exoskeleton training or convectional training, and comparison among times and interventions Intervention Mean (SD) Pairwise comparison (p-value, η2) Baseline Post-intervention Change Baseline vs. Post-intv. IG vs. CG IG 10MWT (m/s) 0.34 (0.16) 0.57 (0.41) 0.19 (0.16) 0.03*, η2 = 0.39 0.69, η2 = 0.04 TUG (s) 40.50 (19.70) 27.3 (15.57) − 13.23 (7.71) 0.00*, η2 = 0.63 0.99, η2 = 0.16 6MWT (m) 114.67 (71.21) 183.56 (133.10) 68.79 (67.55) 0.00*, η2 = 0.43 0.75, η2 = 0.03 WISCI-II (0–20) 8.36 (3.98) 11.91 (4.25) 3.54 (2.65) 0.00*, η2 = 0.60 0.00*, η2 = 0.32 SCIM-III (0–100) 73.54 (7.76) 75.72 (10.05) 2.18 (3.37) 0.03*, η2 = 0.23 0.90, η2 = 0.01 CG 10MWT (m/s) 0.41 (0.22) 0.52 (0.36) 0.12 (0.17) 0.04*, η2 = 0.21 TUG (s) 37.37 (20.38) 30.42 (20.20) − 6.9 (7.22) 0.01*, η2 = 0.33 6MWT (m) 110.95 (72.16) 159.05 (125.50) 48.10 (48.58) 0.02*, η2 = 0.27 WISCI-II (0–20) 11.7 (3.8) 12.40 (4.45) 0,7 (1.49) 0.28, η2 = 0.05 SCIM-III (0–100) 73.8 (5.49) 76.3 (6.10) 2.4 (2.7) 0.02*, η2 = 0.24 CG: control group; IG: intervention group; *significant differences (p < 0.05). η2: calculated effect size; 10MWT: 10 Meters Walking Test; TUG: Test Up and Go; 6MWT: 6 Minutes Walking Test; WISCI-II: Walking Index Spinal Cord Injury-II; SCIM-III: Spinal Cord Independence Measurement-III The original article has been corrected.