Abstract
An extensive investigation has been made of alleged variables in the bursting test. The studj-included clamping pressure, nature of clamping surfaces, sizo of bursting orifice, types of diaphragms, effect of manner of installation of diaphragms , effect of air entrapped under diaphragm, speed of operation, effect of viscosity of liquid medium in hydraulic chamber, calibration and performance of pressure gauges, relation of bursting to tensile results, and relation of size of bursting orifice to bursting pressure. A device is described for measuring the vertical deflection of the paper in the bursting test. As a result of the investigation it is recommended that a clamping pressure be used corresponding to a total load on the specimen of approximately 1,000 pounds. An all-metal clamping head having a relatively smooth clamping surface and a bursting orifice 1.20 inches in diameter is recommended to replace the rubber-faced clamping head formerly used. No evidence was found that the type of diaphragms ordinarily used, the manner of installation, or the viscosity of the hydraulic medium used have a significant effect upon the test. The results are affected to some extent by the testing rate, being somewhat greater the higher the testing rate. Air in the hydraulic chamber, because of its compressi-bility, has the effect of reducing the testing rate. The testing rate may conveniently be expressed in terms of the time interval during which the specimen is being stressed. For the official method this corresponds to about 1 second.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Carson, F. T., & Worthington, F. V. (1931). Critical study of the bursting strength test for paper. Bureau of Standards Journal of Research, 6(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.006.020
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.