Using Machine Translation and Post-Editing in the TRAPD Approach: Effects on the Quality of Translated Survey Texts

8Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A highly controlled experimental setting using a sample of questions from the European Social Survey (ESS) and European Values Study (EVS) was used to test the effects of integrating machine translation and post-editing into the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretesting, and Documentation (TRAPD) approach in survey translation. Four experiments were conducted in total, two concerning the language pair English-German and two in the language pair English-Russian. The overall results of this study are positive for integrating machine translation and post-editing into the TRAPD process, when translating survey questionnaires. The experiments show evidence that in German and Russian languages and for a sample of ESS and EVS survey questions, the effect of integrating machine translation and post-editing on the quality of the review outputs—with quality understood as texts output with the fewest errors possible—can hardly be distinguished from the quality that derives from the setting with human translations only.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zavala-Rojas, D., Behr, D., Dorer, B., Sorato, D., & Keck, V. (2024). Using Machine Translation and Post-Editing in the TRAPD Approach: Effects on the Quality of Translated Survey Texts. Public Opinion Quarterly, 88(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free