Abstract
Environmental debates about which plant and animal species ‘belong’ in particular locations have a growing significance around the world. We argue that ideas about which species constitute weeds or pests and how those species should be managed can be strongly grounded in cultural values and beliefs. Such beliefs are often linked, directly and indirectly, to everyday assumptions about national, regional, local and personal identities. Strong emotional attachments to particular species or landscapes can shape individual and community responses to flora and fauna with implications for issues of sustainable development and planning. This paper focuses on beliefs and practices that are thereby of relevance to urban environmental management. The study setting is the city of Perth, Western Australia. We aim to better understand the connections between nature and culture in a settler-descendant society, focusing on contesting views about ‘indigeneity’ and ‘belonging’, in both social and environmental contexts. Sense of place, the notion of a hybrid cultural and environmental heritage, scientifically informed beliefs about environmentally appropriate practices, and contesting aesthetic preferences are key themes in this discussion.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Trigger, D., & Mulcock, J. (2005). Native vs exotic: cultural discourses about flora, fauna and belonging in Australia. In Sustainable Development and Planning II (Vol. 1, pp. 1301–1310). WIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2495/spd051272
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.