The dependence of election coverage on political institutions: Political competition and policy framing in Germany and the United Kingdom

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Election coverage is often assumed to be different to everyday political coverage. We argue that this depends on political institutions. In majoritarian countries, where elections choose governments, election coverage should decisively move towards political competition and away from policy. In consensual countries, where coalitions are based on policy negotiations, there should be a less pronounced shift towards political competition and away from policy. To test this argument, we use an automatic coding system to study 0.9 billion words in Die Welt for 12 years and in the Financial Times for 30 years. The results support our institutional hypothesis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McMenamin, I., Courtney, M., Breen, M., & McNulty, G. (2023). The dependence of election coverage on political institutions: Political competition and policy framing in Germany and the United Kingdom. Journalism, 24(6), 1281–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211060700

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free