Abstract
Spatial Thinking (ST) is an important part of reasoning. In contrast to Rigid ST (R-ST), Non-Rigid ST (NR-ST) has hardly been researched and tests do not exist, even though NR-ST is crucial for professions that deal with space and time such as engineering and design. Our study at 4 different universities confirms that R-ST does not predict performance in NR-ST; that performance in Non-Rigid ST is significantly lower than in R-ST; and that performance of students in later semesters is not better than in the first semesters. These results highlight the need for further research into NR-ST.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Maheshwary, K., Eisenbart, B., Zorn, S., Nelius, T., Gericke, K., Matthiesen, S., & Blessing, L. (2022). Assessing Rigid and Non-Rigid Spatial Thinking. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 2, pp. 2333–2342). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.236
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.