Assessing Rigid and Non-Rigid Spatial Thinking

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Spatial Thinking (ST) is an important part of reasoning. In contrast to Rigid ST (R-ST), Non-Rigid ST (NR-ST) has hardly been researched and tests do not exist, even though NR-ST is crucial for professions that deal with space and time such as engineering and design. Our study at 4 different universities confirms that R-ST does not predict performance in NR-ST; that performance in Non-Rigid ST is significantly lower than in R-ST; and that performance of students in later semesters is not better than in the first semesters. These results highlight the need for further research into NR-ST.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maheshwary, K., Eisenbart, B., Zorn, S., Nelius, T., Gericke, K., Matthiesen, S., & Blessing, L. (2022). Assessing Rigid and Non-Rigid Spatial Thinking. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 2, pp. 2333–2342). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free