Advantages of b-mode ultrasound combined with strain elastography in differentiation of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis from malignant breast lesions

18Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aim: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) combined with B-mode ultrasound in distinguishing between idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) and malignant breast lesions. Materials and methods: Seventy-seven malignant breast lesions and 36 IGM were assessed using B-mode ultrasound and SE. Ultrasonographic findings for all the breast lesions were classified based on the 2013 American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS-US), and the SE findings were evaluated based on the strain ratio and a five-point scale. The diagnostic performances of B-mode ultrasonography, SE, and the combination of both methods were compared. Results: Significant differences in strain ratio and elastography scores were found between IGM and malignant breast lesions. When the lesions were assessed with B-mode ultrasound alone, in order to distinguish between IGM and malignant breast lesions, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.8%, 66.7%, 85.9%, 85.7%, and 85.8%, respectively. However, when assessed with a combination of B-mode ultrasonography and SE, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 96.1%, 100%, 100%, 92.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of SE and B-mode ultrasound has better diagnostic performance in the differentiation of IGM and malignant breast lesions than B-mode ultrasonography alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arslan, S., Öncü, F., Eryilmaz, M. A., Durmaz, M. S., Altunkeser, A., & Ünlü, Y. (2018). Advantages of b-mode ultrasound combined with strain elastography in differentiation of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis from malignant breast lesions. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 48(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1708-34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free