Abstract
We posit that Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) serves as a way to label, punish, and surveil students, which is antithetical to trauma-informed education. We put existing critiques of PBIS in conversation with literature on trauma-informed education, critical analyses rooted in social justice and draw on our experiences as educators. Grounded in a human-centered pedagogical orientation, we propose that educators advocate against the use of PBIS in their schools and instead focus their efforts on culturally sustaining pedagogies, systemic trauma-informed practices, and affirming practices based on asset views of students and communities.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kim, R. M., & Venet, A. S. (2025). Unsnarling PBIS and Trauma-Informed Education. Urban Education, 60(3), 700–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231175670
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.