Unsnarling PBIS and Trauma-Informed Education

22Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We posit that Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) serves as a way to label, punish, and surveil students, which is antithetical to trauma-informed education. We put existing critiques of PBIS in conversation with literature on trauma-informed education, critical analyses rooted in social justice and draw on our experiences as educators. Grounded in a human-centered pedagogical orientation, we propose that educators advocate against the use of PBIS in their schools and instead focus their efforts on culturally sustaining pedagogies, systemic trauma-informed practices, and affirming practices based on asset views of students and communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, R. M., & Venet, A. S. (2025). Unsnarling PBIS and Trauma-Informed Education. Urban Education, 60(3), 700–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231175670

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free