A qualitative evaluation of patient and healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes, and behavior for safety and use of pexidartinib

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: Pexidartinib is approved in the USA for the treatment of symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Due to risk of serious liver injury, a survey of patient and healthcare provider (HCP) knowledge, attitudes, and behavior (KAB) of the risks was required. Materials methods: Prior to KAB survey execution, structured telephone interviews with 12 patients and 12 HCPs were conducted. Results: The interviews revealed that patients had difficulty with the complexity and wordiness of some of the questions, while HCPs noted that some questions were repetitive with terminology that was not self-explanatory. Of the 15 questions initially in the patient survey, nine were modified for survey inclusion. For the HCP survey, 10 of 18 questions were modified. Conclusion: Qualitative research prior to KAB surveys is recommended to improve comprehension and data quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salas, M., Julian, M., Drogaris, L., Islam, Z., Henderson, M., Stemhagen, A., … Tu, N. (2021). A qualitative evaluation of patient and healthcare provider knowledge, attitudes, and behavior for safety and use of pexidartinib. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 10(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free