Abstract
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) has changed corporate IT by allowing the automation of infrastructure provisioning, enhancing consistency & reducing human mistakes. Ansible and Terraform are among the most widely used Infrastructure as Code (IaC) technologies available. Although their methods, tools & the objectives differ, both strive to streamline the infrastructure management. Based on corporate acceptance, scalability, automation, and efficiency-key criteria-this paper evaluates Ansible and Terraform. Ansible is agentless in design and procedural approach so it excels in configuration management and application deployment. With its declarative language and state management, Terraform is designed for large-scale infrastructure provisioning very differently. This study looks at actual world use of these technologies to demonstrate how businesses optimize their IT systems. Based on the results, Terraform excels in the state management and infrastructure orchestration even if Ansible provides adaptability & the simplicity. The report also examines how businesses use various technologies-sometimes in the concert to strike the ideal mix between infrastructure automation & the configuration management. The paper also examines elements like learning curve, cost-effectiveness & the security concerns. Present processes, long-term scalability objectives & the corporate demands all influence the appropriate IaC technology that IT teams should adopt, hence this comparative research is rather important.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mehdi Syed, A. A., & Anazagasty, E. (2023). Ansible vs. Terraform: A Comparative Study on Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Efficiency in Enterprise IT. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9246.ijetcsit-v4i2p105
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.