When less (potential demand) is more (revenue): Asymmetric bidding capacities in divisible good auctions

13Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We show that asymmetry in bidders' capacity constraints plays an important role in inhibiting collusion and promoting competitive outcomes in multi-unit auctions in which the final value of the good is common knowledge. This effect appears to be related to the increased difficulty of coordination when there are significant differences between bidders. Due to its impact on collusive outcomes, asymmetry in bidding capacities has a more powerful impact on the seller's revenue than does the auction type. Consistent with the finding in Sade et al. (2006) that the discriminatory auction is more susceptible to collusion than the uniform-price auction, asymmetry in capacity constraints has a greater impact in discriminatory auctions. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sade, O., Schnitzlein, C., & Zender, J. F. (2006). When less (potential demand) is more (revenue): Asymmetric bidding capacities in divisible good auctions. Review of Finance, 10(3), 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10679-006-9003-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free