To compare argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) against systemic medications in treatment of acute primary angle-closure: Mid-term results

41Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcome of argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) against systemic medications in treatment of acute primary angle-closure (APAC). Methods: Consecutive patients with APAC were recruited and randomized to receive one of two treatment options: immediate ALPI or systemic acetazolamide±mannitol. All eyes were followed up for at least 6 months after laser iridotomy. Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) and requirement for glaucoma medications. Results: A total of 41 eyes (39 patients) were randomized into the ALPI group, and 38 eyes (32 patients) into the medical treatment group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in sex, age, presenting IOP, and duration of attack. Mean follow-up duration±SD was 15.7 ± 5.8 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean final IOP and requirement for glaucoma medications. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in mean IOP and requirement for glaucoma drugs between APAC eyes treated with ALPI and systemic medications. © 2006 Nature Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lai, J. S. M., Tham, C. C. Y., Chua, J. K. H., Poon, A. S. Y., Chan, J. C. H., Lam, S. W., & Lam, D. S. C. (2006). To compare argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) against systemic medications in treatment of acute primary angle-closure: Mid-term results. Eye, 20(3), 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701867

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free