Abstract
Despite the strong (probably growing) and passionate campaign against the notion of state crimes led by a handful of powerful states and relayed by some ILC members, inclurung the new Special Rapporteur, the distinction between what is termed 'delicts' and what is termed 'crimes' answers an indisputable need and must be maintained. However, while the definition of crimes given in Article 19 of the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility is acceptable, though perhaps unduly sophisticated, the legal regime of these crimes as envisaged by the ILC is debatable. The method adopted to establish this regime has been grossly unsatisfactory and it must be accepted that the word 'crime' might be misleading. The concept is nevertheIess indispensable in contemporary international law.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pellet, A. (2017). Can a state commit a crime? Definitely, Yes! In State Responsibility in International Law (pp. 369–378). Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.2.425
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.