Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part I: Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions

35Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galli, M., Gragnano, F., Berteotti, M., Marcucci, R., Gargiulo, G., Calabrò, P., … Angiolillo, D. J. (2024, October 14). Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part I: Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free