Comparing the effects of time-restricted eating on glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes with standard dietetic practice: A randomised controlled trial

21Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To test the efficacy of time-restricted eating (TRE) in comparison to dietitian-led individualised dietary guidance to improve HbA1c in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: In a parallel groups design, 51 adults (35–65 y) with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and overweight/obesity (HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol), BMI ≥25-≤40 kg/m2) commenced a six-month intervention. Following baseline, participants were randomised to TRE (1000–1900 h) or DIET (individualised dietetic guidance) with four consultations over four months. Changes in HbA1c (primary), body composition, and self-reported adherence (secondary) were analysed using linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 0.3% (4 mmol/mol) HbA1c was set a priori. Results: Forty-three participants (56 ± 8 y, BMI: 33 ± 5 kg/m2, HbA1c: 7.6 ± 0.8%) completed the intervention. HbA1c was reduced (P=0.002; TRE: −0.4% (−5 mmol/mol), DIET: −0.3% (−4 mmol/mol)) with no group or interaction effects; TRE was non-inferior to DIET (−0.11%, 95%CI: −0.50% to 0.28%). Body mass reduced in both groups (TRE: −1.7 kg; DIET: −1.2 kg) via ∼900 kJ/d spontaneous energy reduction (P<0.001). Self-reported adherence was higher in TRE versus DIET (P<0.001). Conclusions: When individualised dietary guidance is not available, effective, and/or suitable, TRE may be an alternative dietary strategy to improve glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parr, E. B., Radford, B. E., Hall, R. C., Steventon-Lorenzen, N., Flint, S. A., Siviour, Z., … Hawley, J. A. (2024). Comparing the effects of time-restricted eating on glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes with standard dietetic practice: A randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111893

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free