Does Intra-Abdominal Infection after Curative Gastrectomy Affect Patients' Long-Term Prognosis? A Multi-Center Study Based on a Large Sample Size

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of intra-abdominal infection after curative gastrectomy on the prognosis of patients. Patients and Methods: Data were collected for enrolled patients who underwent curative gastrectomy in two centers; the relationship between intra-abdominal infection and prognosis was analyzed. Results: Of the 5,721 patients in the entire group, intra-abdominal infection occurred in 202 (3.5%) patients. Co-morbidities and duration of surgical procedures ≥240 minutes represented the independent risk factors for intra-abdominal infection. The overall five-year survival of patients with and without intra-abdominal infection was 60.2% and 64.3%, respectively (p = 0.041). After propensity score matching, the five-year overall survival between the two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.909). T staging, N staging, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and age were independent prognostic factors for the overall survival of patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. The meta-analysis of the random effects model showed that there were no significant differences in the five-year overall survival between patients with and without intra-abdominal infection. Conclusions: The development of intra-abdominal infection after curative gastrectomy is associated closely with co-morbidities and longer operation time, whereas intra-abdominal infection does not lead to reduced long-term survival of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tu, R. H., Lin, J. X., Desiderio, J., Li, P., Xie, J. W., Wang, J. B., … Huang, C. M. (2019). Does Intra-Abdominal Infection after Curative Gastrectomy Affect Patients’ Long-Term Prognosis? A Multi-Center Study Based on a Large Sample Size. Surgical Infections, 20(4), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free