Outcome measures for Māori with non-traumatic dental presentations: a retrospective observational study and Kaupapa Māori approach examining emergency department inequities

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To assess the equity of care of patients with non-traumatic dental presentations (NTDP) to Christchurch Emergency Department (ED) in Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: This retrospective observational study reviews NTDP to Christchurch ED over a 2-year period (2018–2020). ED and hospital outcomes were compared for Māori, Pacific peoples and NZ Europeans. Results are interpreted utilising Te Ao Māori principles and discussed referencing a Kaupapa Māori framework. RESULTS: There were a total of 2,034 NTDPs, with Māori (27.0%) and Pacific peoples (6.9%) being over-represented compared to local population estimates (9.4% and 3.2% respectively). Māori experienced shorter wait times (45 minutes, 95% CI 22–86) compared to NZ Europeans (56 minutes, 95% CI 24–97) and Pacific peoples (54 minutes, 95% CI 23–97). Māori had the highest age-standardised incidence of admission, but shorter hospital length of stay (0.9 days, IQR 0.4–2.3) compared to Pacific peoples (3.8 days, IQR 1.8–3.9) and NZ Europeans (2.0 days, IQR 1.0–3.7). CONCLUSION: This is the first paper to employ a Kaupapa Māori approach examining NTDP patients presenting to the ED. While outcome measures were largely positive, differences in demographic variables indicate upstream failures, specifically barriers to accessing primary oral healthcare and a paucity of Kaupapa Māori initiatives. Further action and accountability are required to provide high-quality, equitable care for Māori.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cameron-Dunn, S., Fisher, C., Huria, T., McCombie, A., Forbes, A., & Joyce, L. R. (2024). Outcome measures for Māori with non-traumatic dental presentations: a retrospective observational study and Kaupapa Māori approach examining emergency department inequities. New Zealand Medical Journal, 137(1599), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6233

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free