Reentry and removal: Implications for juvenile confinement facilities

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An important national initiative in juvenile justice is Juvenile Offender Reentry (JOR). The renewed emphasis on offender reintegration has generated significant attention to juvenile justice practices, with the notable exception of juvenile confinement facilities. Juvenile detention and, to a lesser degree, juvenile corrections practitioners are involved but not invested in reentry, having made very few programmatic changes to accommodate JOR initiatives largely because these initiatives have been external to the institution and its staff. Yet, reentry is a powerful concept for juvenile facility practitioners, and the application of reentry principles could have a profound impact on daily operations. This article addresses a range of issues about investing juvenile institutions in reentry practices. Several reentry models are discussed along with their implications for daily operations and programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roush, D. W., Moeser, J., & Walsh, T. B. (2005). Reentry and removal: Implications for juvenile confinement facilities. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 56(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2005.tb00103.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free