Toward Evidence-Based Urban Planning: Integrating Quality Assessments in Literature Reviews

11Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Literature reviews can play a pivotal role in designing urban policies. Here we introduce two tools used by public health specialists to assess the quality of studies and quantify the evidence derived from them: the Risk of Bias Assessment (RoB) and Evaluation of Certainty of Evidence (ECE). The RoB scores articles on several domains (e.g., selection bias, study design, etc.) to provide an appraisal of how rigorous the study is, whereas the ECE tool provides a framework to clearly state how much certainty there is in the outcomes under study. Both tools can be used to enhance literature review articles in urban planning to better inform practitioners on how to best develop policies using a rigorous approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ravensbergen, L., & El-Geneidy, A. (2023). Toward Evidence-Based Urban Planning: Integrating Quality Assessments in Literature Reviews. Journal of the American Planning Association, 89(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2022.2074872

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free