Liquid crystal display and organic light-emitting diode display: present status and future perspectives

995Citations
Citations of this article
878Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, ‘Liquid crystal display (LCD) vs. organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display: who wins?’ has become a topic of heated debate. In this review, we perform a systematic and comparative study of these two flat panel display technologies. First, we review recent advances in LCDs and OLEDs, including material development, device configuration and system integration. Next we analyze and compare their performances by six key display metrics: response time, contrast ratio, color gamut, lifetime, power efficiency, and panel flexibility. In this section, we focus on two key parameters: motion picture response time (MPRT) and ambient contrast ratio (ACR), which dramatically affect image quality in practical application scenarios. MPRT determines the image blur of a moving picture, and ACR governs the perceived image contrast under ambient lighting conditions. It is intriguing that LCD can achieve comparable or even slightly better MPRT and ACR than OLED, although its response time and contrast ratio are generally perceived to be much inferior to those of OLED. Finally, three future trends are highlighted, including high dynamic range, virtual reality/augmented reality and smart displays with versatile functions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H. W., Lee, J. H., Lin, B. Y., Chen, S., & Wu, S. T. (2018, March 1). Liquid crystal display and organic light-emitting diode display: present status and future perspectives. Light: Science and Applications. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2017.168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free