The Impact Of Unethical Reasoning On Different Types Of Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study

  • Eastman J
  • Iyer R
  • Reisenwitz T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper offers support that those students who felt they had stronger reasons for committing unethical academic behaviors are more likely to report committing academic dishonesty than those who felt they had weaker reasons for unethical academic behaviors.  This relationship held for all four categories of academic dishonesty:  cheating (on tests), seeking outside help, plagiarism (on papers), and E-cheating (electronic cheating on tests).  This suggests that students are rationalizing their academic dishonest behaviors and those students who feel they have stronger reasons for committing academic dishonesty are more likely to be academically dishonest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., & Reisenwitz, T. H. (2008). The Impact Of Unethical Reasoning On Different Types Of Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 5(12). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v5i12.1211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free