A comparison of patient satisfaction with emergency department opt-in and opt-out rapid HIV screening

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study objective. To compare patient satisfaction with emergency department (ED) opt-in and opt-out HIV screening. Methods. We conducted a survey in an urban ED that provided rapid HIV screening using opt-in (February 1, 2007-July 31, 2007) and opt-out (August 1, 2007-January 31, 2008) approaches. We surveyed a convenience sample of patients that completed screening in each phase. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with HIV screening. Results. There were 207 and 188 completed surveys during the opt-in and opt-out phases, respectively. The majority of patients were satisfied with both opt-in screening (95%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 92-98) and opt-out screening (94%, 95% CI = 89-97). Satisfaction ratings were similar between opt-in and opt-out phases even after adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and test result (adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI = 0.5-3.1). Conclusions. Emergency department patient satisfaction with opt-in and opt-out HIV screening is similarly high. © 2012 Douglas A. E. White et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, D. A. E., Scribner, A. N., Martin, M. E., & Tsai, S. (2012). A comparison of patient satisfaction with emergency department opt-in and opt-out rapid HIV screening. AIDS Research and Treatment, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/904916

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free