The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

158Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of telestroke-a 2-way, audiovisual technology that links stroke specialists to remote emergency department physicians and their stroke patients-compared to usual care (i.e., remote emergency departments without telestroke consultation or stroke experts). Methods: A decision-analytic model was developed for both 90-day and lifetime horizons. Model inputs were taken from published literature where available and supplemented with western states' telestroke experiences. Costs were gathered using a societal perspective and converted to 2008 US dollars. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were combined with costs to generate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). In the lifetime horizon model, both costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Both one-way sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Results: In the base case analysis, compared to usual care, telestroke results in an ICER of $108,363/QALY in the 90-day horizon and $2,449/QALY in the lifetime horizon. For the 90-day and lifetime horizons, 37.5% and 99.7% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations yielded ICERs

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, R. E., Saltzman, G. M., Skalabrin, E. J., Demaerschalk, B. M., & Majersik, J. J. (2011). The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology, 77(17), 1590–1598. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318234332d

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free