Abstract
Objective: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of telestroke-a 2-way, audiovisual technology that links stroke specialists to remote emergency department physicians and their stroke patients-compared to usual care (i.e., remote emergency departments without telestroke consultation or stroke experts). Methods: A decision-analytic model was developed for both 90-day and lifetime horizons. Model inputs were taken from published literature where available and supplemented with western states' telestroke experiences. Costs were gathered using a societal perspective and converted to 2008 US dollars. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were combined with costs to generate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). In the lifetime horizon model, both costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Both one-way sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Results: In the base case analysis, compared to usual care, telestroke results in an ICER of $108,363/QALY in the 90-day horizon and $2,449/QALY in the lifetime horizon. For the 90-day and lifetime horizons, 37.5% and 99.7% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations yielded ICERs
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nelson, R. E., Saltzman, G. M., Skalabrin, E. J., Demaerschalk, B. M., & Majersik, J. J. (2011). The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology, 77(17), 1590–1598. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318234332d
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.