Ocriplasmin: Who is the best candidate?

12Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, “Who is the best candidate?”

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prospero Ponce, C. M., Stevenson, W., Gelman, R., Agarwal, D. R., & Christoforidis, J. B. (2016, March 17). Ocriplasmin: Who is the best candidate? Clinical Ophthalmology. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97947

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free