The interactive effect of improvement of vitamin D status and VDR FokI variants on oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic subjects: A randomized controlled trial

38Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background/Objectives:The objectives were to evaluate the effects of improvement of vitamin D status on biomarkers of oxidative stress (OS) in type 2 diabetic (T2D) subjects and whether vitamin D receptor (VDR)-FokI polymorphisms could modulate the response to vitamin D3 intake.Subjects/Methods:Subjects with T2D were allocated to one of the two groups to receive either plain doogh (PD; containing 150 mg calcium and no vitamin D/250 ml, n 1 =50) or vitamin D3-fortified doogh (FD; containing 500 IU/250 ml, n 1 =50) twice a day for 12 weeks. Outcomes were changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), superoxide dismutase, glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and malondialdehyde (MDA). VDR genotypes in 140 T2D subjects in FD were determined by FokI restriction enzyme.Results:After 12 weeks, serum 25(OH)D increased significantly in FD (from 38.5±202.2 to 72.0±23.5, P<0.001) as compared with PD (from 38.8±22.8 to 33.4±22.8, P=0.28). Comparisons between FD and PD revealed significant differences in changes of serum MDA (-0.54±0.82 μmol/l vs +0.17±1 μmol/l, P<0.001), GSH (+8.4±40.1 ng/l vs -13.1±29.4 ng/l, P=0.002) and TAC (+0.14±0.43 mmol/lvs +0.02±0.45 mmol/l bovine serum albumin equivalent, P=0.03). Although there was no significant association between FokI genotypes and OS biomarkers, ff variant subgroup showed the weakest response to vitamin D.Conclusions:Improvement of vitamin D status via daily intake of FD ameliorates OS biomarkers in T2D subjects and the interactive effect of FokI genotypes cannot be ruled out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shab-Bidar, S., Neyestani, T. R., & Djazayery, A. (2015). The interactive effect of improvement of vitamin D status and VDR FokI variants on oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic subjects: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(2), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free