Optimizing Physician Payment for a Single-Payer Healthcare System

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Current forms of payment of independent physicians in U.S. health care may incentivize more care (fee-for-service) or less care (capitation), be inequitable across specialties (resource-based relative value scale [RBRVS]), and distract from clinical care (value-based payments [VBP]). Alternative systems should be considered as part of health care financing reform. We propose a “Fee-for-Time” approach that would pay independent physicians using an hourly rate based on years of necessary training applied to time for service delivery and documentation. RBRVS overvalues procedures and undervalues cognitive services. VBP shifts insurance risk onto physicians, introducing incentives to game performance metrics and to avoid potentially expensive patients. The administrative requirements of current payment methods introduce large administrative costs and undermine physician motivation and morale. We describe a Fee-for-Time payment scenario. A combination of single-payer financing and payment of independent physicians using the Fee-for-Time proposal would be simpler, more objective, incentive-neutral, fairer, less easily gamed, and less expensive to administer than any system with physician payment based on fee-for-service using RBRVS and VBP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kemble, S. B., & Kahn, J. G. (2023). Optimizing Physician Payment for a Single-Payer Healthcare System. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services, 53(4), 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231176358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free