Anal canal coronal-sagittal ratio: a novel parameter for diagnosing pelvic floor injury in 2-dimensional transanal ultrasound

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Pelvic floor injury diagnosis using 3-dimensional (3D) pelvic floor ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging is unfeasible in many clinics. We assessed the efficacy of a novel diagnostic parameter, the anal canal coronal-sagittal (CS) ratio, for pelvic floor injury on 2D transanal ultrasound. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 126 female patients who underwent 3D pelvic floor ultrasound (including 2D transanal ultrasound) at a pelvic floor center between August and December 2020. The anal canal CS ratio on 2D transanal ultrasound and pelvic floor avulsion injury measurements were recorded for all patients. Results: A cutoff anal canal CS ratio of 1.15 was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis (sensitivity, 0.820; specificity, 0.763; and area under the curve, 0.838). Patients were categorized into the anal canal CS ratio ≥1.15 and the anal canal CS ratio < 1.15 groups. Bilateral pelvic floor avulsion was more common in the anal canal CS ratio ≥1.15 group (n = 35, 56.5%), and the incidence of pelvic floor avulsion was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.001). Existing parameters of pelvic floor injury, including minimal levator hiatus (P = 0.001), levator plate descent angle (P = 0.001), and levator ani deficiency score (P = 0.001), were statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusion: The anal canal CS ratio was an efficient novel parameter that indirectly detected pelvic floor injury in 2D transanal ultrasound. It is a potential alternative indicator for pelvic floor injury on the widely popular 2D transanal ultrasound.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeong, H. Y., Hyun, K., & Lee, J. K. (2024). Anal canal coronal-sagittal ratio: a novel parameter for diagnosing pelvic floor injury in 2-dimensional transanal ultrasound. Annals of Coloproctology, 40(5), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00129.0018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free