Fetish-Oriented Ontology

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In her essay, After de Brosses (2017), Rosalind C. Morris briefly considers the historical importance of the concept of the fetish on the relatively recent movements of new materialism, but she does not engage with Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented Ontology. This essay addresses this gap and focuses on the influence of the fetish on Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented Ontology by focusing on Graham Harman's conception of objects and Quentin Meillassoux's theory of arche-fossils. In short, I am offering a posthumanist theorization of the fetish in order to argue that Object-Oriented Ontology can be considered, at points, to be a fetish-oriented ontology and that this notion of the fetish allows us to think about philosophical considerations of objects in a new light.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braune, S. (2020). Fetish-Oriented Ontology. Open Philosophy, 3(1), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free